![]() |
Changing an induction motor voltage |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 16> |
| Author | |||
coulomb
Senior Member
Joined: 22 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 1472 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Changing an induction motor voltagePosted: 24 April 2010 at 10:35pm |
||
One quick indication is if you see wires from the junction box joining with two or more windings wires. That means that some windings are already in parallel, so it's not going to be trivial to arrange them for lower voltage. Every motor of reasonable size that I've seen seems to have windings already in parallel. So that "for free" gain doesn't seem to arise very often. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Huub35
Noobie
Joined: 24 March 2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 23 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 April 2010 at 6:53pm |
||
Dear all, just bought a 7.5 kW four pole. Windings in 400 V Delta, 690 Star (or thereabout). Originally thought that this might be a good motor to test (it was dirty and cheap)inverter etc., but now also starting to consider to use this as a drive motor for a lighter car. I know in Germany drives a Opel Corsa with a 5.5 kW 4-pole, and that is working. However, getting something better for free remains very appealing, so I was thinking about rewiring it into a lower voltage. My inverter does 55 kW continous, and I would keep the clutch + gearbox for a start. My question is, how to recognize the several windings. Should I post a picture here, or is there some general knowhow that I can immediately use to determine the type of winding? Pictures is difficult as I do not know how to do that :-0, and also as the motor is in storage a bit farther away. Many thanks for your thoughts about this, regards, Huub |
|||
![]() |
|||
a4x4kiwi
AEVA Member
Joined: 03 January 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 581 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2010 at 7:55am |
||
|
I updated progress here
|
|||
|
Silicon is just sand with attitude.
Blog: http://a4x4kiwi.blogspot.com EVAlbum: http://www.evalbum.com/1687 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Johny
AEVA Member
Joined: 23 June 2008 Location: Melbourne Online Status: Offline Posts: 1680 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2010 at 7:25am |
||
|
Just in case it's useful I tracked down that contact-free shaft encoder I mentioned a few posts up. Unfortunately it's only a 256 CPR.
It's an AVAGO. Around $25. http://www.avagotech.com/pages/en/motion_control_encoder_products/magnetic_encoders/aeat-601bf06/ Edited by Johny - 24 February 2010 at 7:25am |
|||
![]() |
|||
a4x4kiwi
AEVA Member
Joined: 03 January 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 581 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 February 2010 at 4:33am |
||
|
That crossed my mind too.
In the mounting instructions they suggest a 2.5mm pin screwed into the body of the motor. I think that would also have some movement. |
|||
|
Silicon is just sand with attitude.
Blog: http://a4x4kiwi.blogspot.com EVAlbum: http://www.evalbum.com/1687 |
|||
![]() |
|||
coulomb
Senior Member
Joined: 22 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 1472 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 10:03pm |
||
Good to see. Just one comment... with an 800 pulse per revolution encoder (so 0.45 degrees between pulses), maybe the slight movement from that coat hanger wire might be enough to cause jitter in the least significant few bits? Perhaps more so when changing from reverse to forward, and vice versa. 0.45 degrees is about 0.2 mm at 25 mm radius. Would it move that much/little? I don't have any idea whether it might move that much or not, but it seems possible that a totally rigid connection from resolver/encoder to the motor case may be needed. For simplicity's sake, I hope not! |
|||
![]() |
|||
a4x4kiwi
AEVA Member
Joined: 03 January 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 581 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 5:44pm |
||
|
More progress... http://a4x4kiwi.blogspot.com/2010/02/more-progress-on-encoder.html
I didn't know about the 500 pulses per pole pair. Here's hoping 800 is enough. Edited by a4x4kiwi - 21 February 2010 at 5:54pm |
|||
|
Silicon is just sand with attitude.
Blog: http://a4x4kiwi.blogspot.com EVAlbum: http://www.evalbum.com/1687 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Squiggles
Senior Member
Joined: 21 April 2009 Location: Newcastle NSW Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 10:03am |
||
Be careful that it does not unscrew itself when you reverse the motor. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Squiggles
Senior Member
Joined: 21 April 2009 Location: Newcastle NSW Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 10:02am |
||
I am amazed that in the days of high speed digital computing that there is a need for anything like 800ppr. even 360 gives an absolute resolution of 1 deg and effectively this can be doubled by software. With slip variable between 0 & 4% and the maximum rate of change of angular velocity of the rotor relatively low why there is a need for super high resolution baffles me
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Johny
AEVA Member
Joined: 23 June 2008 Location: Melbourne Online Status: Offline Posts: 1680 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 9:19am |
||
|
I'm not sure about these but sometime in the last 2 weeks I got an email from some company (regular advertising stuff) about a contact free shaft encoder. I following it up enough to find that farnell stocked them but lost interest because I figured I already had an 8mm shaft.
They claimed a wide tolerance for mis-mounting and use a magnetic coupler which is glued to the end of a shaft. I'm sorry I can't make it easier but if you think that the motor magnetic field won't interfere it may be worth looking into. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Hemonster
Groupie
Joined: 30 November 2008 Location: Christchurch NZ Online Status: Offline Posts: 92 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 9:12am |
||
|
Hi Mal,
Interested in your update, thanks for posting.
Is this really enough pulses per revolution? The recommended for the controller I have (a PDL VFD) is 1000-2000 ppr per motor pole pair (sounds like a lot to me). The minimum they say is 500 ppr per pole pair, so for your 4-pole motor would be 1000 ppr minimum. I think the higher the ppr the better the control at low rpm, is this true? |
|||
![]() |
|||
weber
Senior Member
Joined: 23 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 652 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 8:15am |
||
|
Woody, that 2/3 rewind idea is clever. You've solved the different resistance problem, but unfortunately not the different waveform problem, so there would be circulating harmonic currents as coulomb mentioned. But how bad they would be is another question. But based on coulomb's and my experience of trying to find the crossover wires on a motor with _clear_ varnish, the chances of finding all 12 of them on Mal's motor are slim to nonexistent.
Thanks for a neat notation too, Woody. Mal, thanks for the info re the encoder, and the photo on the lathe. We need to put a taper-lock hub on our fan shaft to couple to our aircon/power-steering pulley, so Ross Pink suggests adding a shaft extension for the encoder by precisely drilling and tapping into the end of the shaft and threading a 12 mm dia post in. I'm wondering if that can be done without a lathe and without removing the shaft, by powering the motor and mounting the drill in a vise or something? |
|||
![]() |
|||
a4x4kiwi
AEVA Member
Joined: 03 January 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 581 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 6:03am |
||
|
Silicon is just sand with attitude.
Blog: http://a4x4kiwi.blogspot.com EVAlbum: http://www.evalbum.com/1687 |
|||
![]() |
|||
a4x4kiwi
AEVA Member
Joined: 03 January 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 581 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 February 2010 at 5:57am |
||
|
Hi all,
I selected the encoder based on the Danfoss input max frequency with a push pull driver is 65khz. This equates to 886 pulses per revolution at 4400rpm. Encoders are usually available in 100 increment steps. They did not have it x stock but it arrived from Germany within 2 weeks. Give them a call. Jill was very helpful. The price was $491 +GST. The price had just came down by $50 due to exchange rate changes. |
|||
|
Silicon is just sand with attitude.
Blog: http://a4x4kiwi.blogspot.com EVAlbum: http://www.evalbum.com/1687 |
|||
![]() |
|||
coulomb
Senior Member
Joined: 22 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 1472 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 2:09pm |
||
For this part, err, no.
That's brilliant! You end up with a coil spanning 11 teeth in series with a coil spanning 7 teeth, for a total of 18 teeth, in parallel with a 9+9 and a 7+11, so they all span 18 teeth! However, I wonder if the middle slot pairs (like 2=11 in series with 20=20) might get more voltage induced because they are less affected by adjacent slots that are out-of-phase. I also wonder if there is a good way of measuring the circulating currents, after you try something like this. Of course, this still has the problem of finding the 12 wires that cross from one slot pair to another (e.g. where 1=12 currently connects to 2=11). |
|||
![]() |
|||
woody
AEVA Member
Joined: 29 June 2008 Location: Mt Colah Online Status: Offline Posts: 1274 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 1:35pm |
||
The 2 pole would probably be less efficient that a dedicated two pole, more like a dahlander 2 speed. That aside: Each of A1 and A2 with the same current would now be making a field in the same direction (e.g. left to right) instead of against each other (e.g. outer to inner) + a consequent/phantom pole (inner to outer). So that means only half the flux lines for the rotor to cut, i.e a quarter of the torque. We can't increase the current as we're all out of voltage. I'm not helping, am I.
going back to dahlander:
Both of dahlander windings require series delta. Back to crazy ideas: Rewind for 2/3 voltage: Cut the jumpers between the concentric windings and re-pair them as Outer + Inner, Inner + outer, Middle + Middle for approximately the same resistance. I.E. A is currently made up of ('=' means coils '-' means series connection) 1=12-2=11-3=10 in parallel with 19=30-20=29-21=28 Reconnecting the coils as: 1=12-21=28 and 2=11-20=29 and 3=10-19=30 in parallel This gives Mal 480V star (720V * 2/3) and 275V delta. Worth a bash when you have the money for a rewind when it all goes pear-shaped. 275V should give 230Nm @ 2200rpm (56kph) i.e. 53kW 0-90 in 17 seconds instead of 31. top speed 120 instead of 95 cheers, Woody |
|||
|
Planned EV: '63 Cortina using Industrial AC and LiFePO4 Battery Pack
|
|||
![]() |
|||
coulomb
Senior Member
Joined: 22 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 1472 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 12:47pm |
||
For a conversion that is keeping the gearbox (so you are wanting something like 3000 RPM in the middle of the motor's speed range), that seems like a reasonable compromise: get a cheap 4-pole motor that has consequent poles, and do the easy rewire for 2 poles and double the power. Use the gearbox to turn the extra speed into more torque for low speed. I can't help feeling that this rewire is "getting something for nothing". Will you really get the same torque at twice the speed by just swapping the windings? It seems to me that you would somehow get half the torque when the speed doubles. Can someone help me imagine this correctly?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
weber
Senior Member
Joined: 23 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 652 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 12:31pm |
||
Hi Mal, coulomb and I are in the market for an encoder now too. In another thread acmotor suggested one for about $200 from RS Components, but the only one I could find that matched that description has a 4 mm diameter solid shaft, which means it needs a flexible coupling and precise alignment. It seems designed for much smaller motors as I couldn't find a flexible coupling that could tolerate the typical end-float of a 132-frame induction motor. And Ross Pink warned me against using solid shaft encoders anyway and swears by hollow shaft encoders because flexible couplings don't last and mounting is allowed to be much less precise with a hollow shaft. So can you tell us a price for that INGH 12HS 33AM 00800 encoder? Why did you go for 800 ppr? Ross Pink suggests the version with differential outputs for noise immunity. And we'd only need a 2 m cable so that would be an INGH 12HS 27AM 00800. I guess it depends what they keep in stock? |
|||
![]() |
|||
coulomb
Senior Member
Joined: 22 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 1472 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 12:25pm |
||
Yes, sadly, this seems to be the common configuration. So the only recourse is to find the centre tap of each slot pair (all 18 of them), and wire each half in parallel with the other:
That would give you a 207.5 V delta (or 360 V star) 4-pole motor. It sure seems like a lot of work. Then, there is the problem of finding the centre of the winding to cut it; I can't think of a reasonable way. Maybe you can put pulses at one end, and measure the ~2.6 nanoseconds of delay that each extra ~800 mm of wire in each turn would give you. Perhaps you can capacitively or inductively couple to the wire without cutting it. Perhaps there are instruments you could hire, designed to find faults in cables perhaps, that do this for you somehow. You could perhaps simulate a fault by clamping some sort of magnetic short circuit around the wire. Start with the clamp at the end of the winding, note the distance, and find the wire with exactly half that distance. It's so frustrating; all the wire is already there, it just needs to be reconfigured a little. Yet the only way seems to be to burn out all the old wire and start again! |
|||
![]() |
|||
woody
AEVA Member
Joined: 29 June 2008 Location: Mt Colah Online Status: Offline Posts: 1274 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 10:39am |
||
|
Just having a look at the piccies and in reference to Chapter 4 of the "Electric Motor Repair":
Looks like a "Consequent Pole" 4 pole motor with concentric windings (starting at the top going clockwise) Phase A is A1: 1-12 2-11 3-10 A2: 19-30 20-29 21-28 Phase B is B1: 13-24 14-23 15-22 B2: 31-6 32-5 33-4 Phase C is C1: 25-36 26-35 27-34 C2: 7-18 8-17 9-16 I can see fat wires coming out of the outer of slots 6, 24, 30, and the inner of slot 33. There will be 6 wires coming from the terminal box. It looks like A1 & A2 etc. are in parallel already, looking at the connections on top around slot 27-36. If you're feeling keen you can pull apart these insulated wires and maybe convert to 2 pole 30kW by reversing A2,B2,C2 connections. Probably the best thing to do is take lots of photos, work out which wires go where as best you can, and put it all back together without breaking anything. Then you can do some homework, figure out if anything good is possible, and pull it out again later and do it. cheers, Woody |
|||
|
Planned EV: '63 Cortina using Industrial AC and LiFePO4 Battery Pack
|
|||
![]() |
|||
HeadsUp
Senior Member
Joined: 28 February 2009 Location: Sydney Online Status: Offline Posts: 255 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 9:02am |
||
|
are you going to try and soften it with any solvent to loosen it up ?
what would do that without damaging the insulation on the wires ? |
|||
|
Buddha...There are only two mistakes one can make along the path to truth - not going all the way and not starting
|
|||
![]() |
|||
a4x4kiwi
AEVA Member
Joined: 03 January 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 581 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2010 at 8:58am |
||
|
I just pulled my motor out with a view to placing the phases in parallel in order to convert it to 220v star. Unfortunately the wiring is all gooped up with a hard brittle substance preventing getting into it.
I am also fitting an 800ppr encoder. See my blog for details and full resolution photos. Here are some photos.
|
|||
|
Silicon is just sand with attitude.
Blog: http://a4x4kiwi.blogspot.com EVAlbum: http://www.evalbum.com/1687 |
|||
![]() |
|||
antiscab
Admin Group
Forum Admin Joined: 25 November 2007 Location: Perth, WA Online Status: Offline Posts: 1501 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 February 2010 at 4:57pm |
||
|
ah, righto....a blast from the past post then :)
confusion over :) Matt |
|||
|
Matt
http://www.evalbum.com/1499 http://www.evalbum.com/1809 |
|||
![]() |
|||
weber
Senior Member
Joined: 23 January 2009 Location: Brisbane Online Status: Offline Posts: 652 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 February 2010 at 7:29am |
||
Hi Matt, Neville is referring back to the Loo Tech Electricity Amplifier whose invention was indeed first announced in this very thread back in July 2009. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Electrocycle
Senior Member
Joined: 19 October 2008 Location: Sydney Online Status: Offline Posts: 849 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 February 2010 at 6:03am |
||
still wrong thread, but oh no... He's measured the cogging torque as the motor output, and the current required to make it turn with no load as the power input. Doesn't seem to realise that you'd also need to overcome any output load! |
|||
|
The Engine Whisperer - fixer of things
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 16> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Home | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |